Browse / Agent tools
collectiveai-team/botica
Recipes and standards for projects: deterministic rules, templates, and design decisions for AI coding agents (opencode, Claude Code, Codex).
- design
Works.Tested on 2026-10-27. From the README alone, on Linux with Luna.
What we checked
Does it run from the README?Yes. Running in 0:33 on a clean Linux box.The run
Tested Oct 27, 2026, rev 49f2459.
Does it do what the README says?1 of 1 claims held up.Evidence
“botica lint runs rules over project files and reports findings”
Expected lint findings are printed. Got warning [file-size-guard].
Which setups did we try?Works with Luna. Our Haiku test broke, so no mark there.Setups
Linux / Haiku: our test broke. Linux / Luna: works, Oct 27, rev 49f2459.
Needs keys, a login or a browser?No.Details
None seen
Is it safe to run?No unexpected network or file activity found in these checksWhat we saw
No problems traced to this repository code in these checks; a short run cannot prove safety. 12 listed items (named-host connections, static matches, dependency advisories) are below and do not change this verdict.
Gitleaks found a possible hardcoded secret; value withheld. 2 distinct locations. 2 findings.
OSV reports a known vulnerability in this dependency version. 4 distinct locations. 4 findings.
Reviewed as expected for a test run: read only test files inside the test workspace or its temporary folders.
Full event, path and process lists for each observed setup:
A quiet run is not a safety guarantee.
Is it maintained?Maintained · 633 commits in 90 days · 72 merged PRs in 90 days · 1 open issues · 10 open PRsActivity
actively maintained: last commit 0 days ago; 633 commits and 72 merged PRs in 90 days; 1 open issues, 10 open PRs; 3 of 4 recent threads got a maintainer reply, median first reply 481.7h; latest release 2026-10-27
Can I show this on my README?Copy the badge.Badge
The run
Oct 27 · rev 49f2459Independent test, not endorsed by the project.