Browse / MCP servers
jgstew/bigfix-remote-client-relevance
Evaluate client relevance on systems through multiple possible mechanisms. Local, Container, SSH, FastQuery.
- MCP
Works.Tested on 2026-10-27. From the README alone, on Linux with Haiku.
What we checked
Does it run from the README?Yes. Running in 2:51 on a clean Linux box.The run
Tested Oct 27, 2026, rev ed67fc5.
Does it do what the README says?2 of 2 claims held up.Evidence
“Evaluate a client relevance expression inside a container with a pinned qna version”
Expected Linux Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS. Got Linux Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS.
“--schema prints the JSON Schema for a single result”
Expected ClientRelevanceResult schema. Got ClientRelevanceResult.
Which setups did we try?Works with Haiku.Setups
Linux / Haiku: works, Oct 27, rev ed67fc5.
Needs keys, a login or a browser?No.Details
None seen
Is it safe to run?Made outbound HTTPS connections: yes (hosts not recorded) by bigfix-remote-client-relevanceWhat we saw
Review signals across current setups: connection review, sensitive read.
Repository processes attempted these non-loopback connections; proxies can hide the final hostname. 4 distinct locations. 5 attributed processes.
A repository process attempted to read this sensitive path. Kind of file: cloud login. 5 attributed processes.
Reviewed as expected for a test run: attempted writes that failed, so nothing was written.
Full event, path and process lists for each observed setup:
A quiet run is not a safety guarantee.
Is it maintained?Maintained · 165 commits in 90 days · 36 merged PRs in 90 days · 12 open issues · 1 open PRsActivity
actively maintained: last commit 0 days ago; 165 commits and 36 merged PRs in 90 days; 12 open issues, 1 open PRs; latest release 2026-10-27
Can I show this on my README?Copy the badge.Badge
The run
Oct 27 · rev ed67fc5Independent test, not endorsed by the project.