Browse / Agent tools
rubik/radon
Various code metrics for Python code
Works.Tested on 2026-10-27. From the README alone, on Linux with Haiku.
What we checked
Does it run from the README?Yes. Running in 2:06 on a clean Linux box.The run
Tested Oct 27, 2026, rev 54b88e5.
Does it do what the README says?2 of 2 claims held up.Evidence
“Radon computes cyclomatic complexity from the command line with radon cc”
Expected mi_compute listed with complexity rank A. Got F 98:0 mi_compute - A.
“Radon computes raw metrics such as LOC and SLOC”
Expected raw metrics report with LOC 245. Got LOC: 245.
Which setups did we try?Works with Haiku. Unverified with Luna.Setups
Linux / Haiku: works, Oct 27, rev 54b88e5. Linux / Luna: unverified, Oct 27, rev 54b88e5.
Needs keys, a login or a browser?No.Details
None seen
Is it safe to run?No unexpected network or file activity found in these checksWhat we saw
No problems traced to this repository code in these checks; a short run cannot prove safety. 220 listed items (named-host connections, static matches, dependency advisories) are below and do not change this verdict.
OSV reports a known vulnerability in this dependency version. 9 distinct locations. 110 findings.
Reviewed as expected for a test run: attempted writes that failed, so nothing was written.
Full event, path and process lists for each observed setup:
A quiet run is not a safety guarantee.
Is it maintained?Abandoned · 0 commits in 90 days · 0 merged PRs in 90 days · 36 open issues · 17 open PRsActivity
abandoned: last commit 736 days ago; 0 commits and 0 merged PRs in 90 days; 36 open issues, 17 open PRs; 9 of 49 recent threads got a maintainer reply, median first reply 1631.1h; no releases
Can I show this on my README?Copy the badge.Badge
The run
Oct 27 · rev 54b88e5Independent test, not endorsed by the project.